|
Britney Spears Under
Attack: Cannons to the Right of Her, Cannons to the Left of Her.
Call
it the politics of being Britney Spears.
Britney has been taking a lot of heat from both the liberal and
conservative media – for, as always, no good reason.
First
there is the annoying Jennifer Ordonez, writing in Newsweek.
You remember Newsweek, right? It’s
the magazine your parents glanced at when they took you to the dentist’s
office and that you paid no attention to whatsoever.
In
fact, Newsweek’s reporters can be divided into three distinct groups:
Liberals, liberals and liberals.
So
here’s Ms. Ordonez, in a recent issue, desperately trying to impress her
(um, liberal) bosses by trashing Britney for doing the unthinkable –
supporting President Bush.
This,
of course, is a crime against humanity at the one-party magazine.
Rather
than admit she is horrified that anyone in the arts, let alone someone
extremely high up in the arts, is not a liberal Democrat, Jennifer tries
attacking on a different front to conceal the actual agenda.
The
article suggests that “early handicappers” and “industry watchers”
(translation: people who don’t know what they’re talking about) think
Britney’s new CD isn’t going to do well.
That
would be the CD that isn’t even out yet.
Never
mind that Britney’s detractors always say this just before an album drop.
Never mind that Britney is the only woman in pop music history to have
each of her previous (three) albums open at the number one position on
Billboard.
No,
that’s just not good enough for this crowd.
Naturally,
Jennifer fails to mention Britney’s support for American troops fighting
overseas, just as she fails to mention her tremendous contributions to
charities for the victims of 9/11 and additional organizations that assist
military families.
Then
again, it’s Newsweek. You
praised a Republican. You’re
out.
Here’s
the tip-off in Ms. Ordonez’s commentary:
In
a recent interview on CNN, she [Britney]
spoke fondly of her girl-on-girl smooch [with
Madonna] before declaring her unwavering trust in George W. Bush and
his war efforts. Sounds like
somebody who isn’t quite sure who her audience is.
Now
we understand where Ms. Ordonez is going.
Not
only does the reporter feel, again, it’s unacceptable that each and every
musician isn’t a liberal, she further condescends by suggesting that Britney
doesn’t know that each and every conservative objects to/disapproves of/is
offended by her MTV performance with Madonna (and Christine Aguilera).
That’s
good, Jen, that’s perfect. All
liberals/Democrats enjoy sexuality and sex whereas all
conservatives/Republicans are completely turned off by it, right?
There’s
only one problem with the Ordonez thesis.
If conservatives and Republicans are so offended by sex, one wonders
how it came to be that there are so many of them.
It
sounds like Jennifer is quite sure who her audience is.
Of
course, reading gibberish on Britney from a staunch right-winger like writer
Brent Bozell makes lefty Jennifer Ordonez sound like a moderate.
Rather
than be pleased that this particular artist supports President Bush, Mr.
Bozell isn’t happy. No, support
of President Bush just isn’t good enough for this particular conservative.
In
a recent column, Mr. Bozell is exorcised because of a performance Britney gave
during the season premier of Monday Night Football.
That’s
right. Brent didn’t care for
her performance, so he wrote the following:
Now
that Britney’s turned 21, she’s legally become America’s official symbol
of slutty sex appeal.
Kinda
makes you wonder if Mr. Bozell has lost it.
Hey Brent. Hello.
It was a performance! It’s
just for fun. It’s not supposed
to be taken seriously, not supposed to be analyzed, not supposed to be
interpreted… oh, what’s the use?
Mr.
Bozell isn’t finished there, he goes on to trash entertainment industry
executives, including those from the NFL and ABC and drops in this gem:
So
why are they imposing these slutty singers as role models on the rest of
society? It’s not for anything
more than a quick buck.
Imposing?
Brent, here’s a fresh concept – if you don’t like it, don’t
watch.
For
a conservative writer, “slutty” is a word Mr. Bozell seems unusually
comfortable with. And where does
he get “role models” – did anyone from the broadcast suggest Britney’s
performance is some kind of life lesson?
There’s
nothing quite like a shrill ultra-conservative to drive away the artists that
are attracted to the conservative side.
Brent
Bozell’s idea of appropriate half-time entertainment at a football game is,
evidently, nuns square dancing.
Apparently,
liberals won’t be satisfied with Britney until she comes out wearing a
button that reads, “Vote Democrat!” whereas conservatives won’t be
satisfied with Britney until she covers herself from head to toe.
When
it comes to the media, Britney can’t win for losing.
And
neither can we.
brachman.com |